Showing posts with label dairy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dairy. Show all posts

Friday, April 17, 2026

How aAa Qualities Improve Udder Milkability

Mich Livestock Service, Inc — "For the Best in Bulls" and "High Energy Forages" 110 N Main St (PO Box 661) Ovid, MI 48866 📞 (989) 834-2661 | ✉️ greg@michiganlivestock.com | 🌐 www.michiganlivestock.com

Mark Curry (989) 984-7027 — Route Services and Sales Sue Palen (989) 277-0480 — Office Manager, Products Manager Greg Palen (989) 277-6031 — "aAa" Approved Analyzer, Certified Seed Specialist


In the mating of cows to "balance" physical structure, there is a great opportunity to develop more uniform udder construction — shape, teat placement, and pelvic housing. Milking systems work best when you can achieve the following five qualities:


Level — Floor to the Udder

aAa #6 Style: Keeps all nerve fiber, ligament and cartilage structures more substantial. Besides the center ligament linear shows, there are also lateral ligaments — all anchored to pelvic bones. Move the thurl to the center of the pelvic bones and the rump will be level, supporting levelness in the entire udder (avoiding high pins that are caused by a forward-tipping pelvis).


Elastic — Texture to the Udder

aAa #2 Tall: Related to natural BST, this keeps adolescent growth rates efficient, avoiding body fat storage in the wrong places (around kidneys, around the uterus, and inside mammary tissue) so that the udder avoids becoming heavy ("meaty") and is able to milk down to a "rag." "Tall" lifting of the skeleton arches the flank and thigh muscles so the udder is higher off the ground.


Full — Rear Udder Capacity

aAa #1 Dairy: The frame develops a "wedge" shape, with broader hips. As the udder forms, it takes on a "fuller" shape in the rear quarters. As milk production ideally comes 60% from the rear quarters and 40% from the fore quarters, full rear udder capacity means more milk ability.

aAa #3 Open: It is not enough to have broad hips — it is also desirable to have wide thurls and pins that do not curve inward. This creates more "room" for a maturing udder to stay up out of harm's way and to avoid fore teats being forced to the outer edge of the quarters.


Square — Teat Placement

aAa #5 Smooth: Sets teats centrally under each quarter, to be an effective funnel for milk flow. Helps to shorten excessively long teats and blunt ends of teats for sphincter protection.

aAa #1 Dairy: Dairy stimulates hormone production so that four teats get formed of equal size. Once milking, Dairy stimulates the production of oxytocin for milk letdown.


Strong — Udder Tissue

aAa #4 Strong: Heftier mammary tissue helps keep teats "plumb." Strong circulation helps to remove toxins and inflammation from the udder. 286 pounds of blood circulate through the udder for every pound of milk she makes, so the size and power in the heart is important.

Wednesday, April 15, 2026

Too Much Butterfat? Not Enough Protein — and What to Do About It Genetically

Michigan Livestock Service, Inc — "For the Best in Bulls" and "High Energy Forages" 110 N Main St (PO Box 661) Ovid, MI 48866 📞 (989) 834-2661 | ✉️ greg@michiganlivestock.com | 🌐 www.michiganlivestock.com

Mark Curry (989) 984-7027 — Route Services and Sales Sue Palen (989) 277-0480 — Office Manager, Products Manager Greg Palen (989) 277-6031 — "aAa" Approved Analyzer, Certified Seed Specialist


We hear a lot of concern over milk price trends. A year ago, the Federal Order system quietly gave processors an extra 95 cents for "make allowances" (costs of processing milk). Understanding why was harder, but as butterfat price went down, official pronouncements finally told all and sundry: "you are producing TOO MUCH Butterfat!" Rising protein prices are not making up the difference yet.

However, at the root of the higher make allowances was that for cheese makers — who now use more milk than any other sector, including bottling — there is a lot of extra expense when they have to skim cream out of raw milk to reach the ideal fat-to-protein ratio for cheese curd formation. Also at fault is the emergence of the "E" gene for Kappa Casein (frequently found in higher Genomic rank sires), which lowers cheese yields dramatically. Some pooled loads of milk have been rejected by cheese makers for not setting an economic quantity of cheese!


Breeding Selection for Protein

The late Pete Blodgett (GM for Landmark Genetics, which became Alta Genetics) developed some unique bulls who were plus for Protein % with high milk yields but — to satisfy California FMO fat quotas — were really low for Butterfat %. But in the near-universal adoption of "multiple Component pricing" here and in Europe, such bulls fell out of favor. Today it has become difficult to sell bulls "minus" for butterfat %, so the genetic base for Fat has climbed alongside feeding strategies that encourage Fat (e.g., roasted high oil soybeans).

But at this point in time, we need to look toward bulls who are meaningfully "plus" for Protein % and avoid bulls who carry the "E" gene for Kappa Casein — favor AA, AB or BB Kappa Casein.

Here are some useful examples from Triple Hill Sires:

Sire Protein % Kappa Casein
525HO146 Feature -P +.10% BB
525LD 101 Horizon P Red +.11% AB
525HO135 Radix -P *RC +.08% AB
525HO140 Genesis -P *RC +.09% AA
525HO117 Rex PP Red +.05% AB
525HO138 Challenger Red +.09% AA
525HO131 Lion King B/R +.07% AB
525HO142 Lu-Tenant Red +.05% AA
525HO132 Felon +.05% AA
525HO133 Bushwacker +.05% AA

Combining all our bull sources, we can help dramatically improve Protein% and Cheese Yields.

Monday, April 13, 2026

Teat Length and Teat Placement: Genetic Trends and Selection Strategies

Mich Livestock Service, Inc — "For the Best in Bulls" and "High Energy Forages" 110 N Main St (PO Box 661) Ovid, MI 48866 📞 (989) 834-2661 | ✉️ greg@michiganlivestock.com | 🌐 www.michiganlivestock.com

Mark Curry (989) 984-7027 — Route Services and Sales Sue Palen (989) 277-0480 — Office Manager, Products Manager Greg Palen (989) 277-6031 — "aAa" Approved Analyzer, Certified Seed Specialist


Forty years ago when I was breeding Jerseys, the breed had a terrific issue with reverse tilted udders and asymmetrical teat placement (too wide in front, too close in rear). The source of these problems were primarily the index world's fixation on sons and grandsons of Observer Chocolate Soldier. This basically proved that linebreeding to an "index", concentrating on a ranked sire line without regard to genetic structural differences, leads us to problems.

Today we have a similar issue in Holsteins. Udders are moving forward under the pelvis, the rear teats are only half the size/length of the fore teats, and fore teats are moving wider. The linear solution is to create "robot ready" indexes (drawing sales away from the dominance of the Genomic Observer sire line — an ironic coincidence of names!), but addressing the cause of these problems requires more thought than a sales gimmick slogan.

For most people, the biggest issue is teats too short. Linear graphs show a majority of ranked sires are "left of the average line" for teat length. Here are some favorites of ours, sourced by AI Total who bucked this trend and will keep your udders more "milkable":


Vogue A2P2 -PP (aAa 3 1 5 2 4 6) — +0.50 teat length @ 94% Rel. | Also A2A2 Beta Casein Now an Elite sire of polled sons, recently scored 97 points at seven years of age!

Aurora Blackjack -P (aAa 4 5 3 2 1 6) — +0.73 teat length | Both A2A2 Beta C and BB Kappa C Like "A2P2" he is significantly "plus" for both Butterfat% and Protein% and lower Somatic Cell

Lorita Sphinx -PP (aAa 2 4 3 1 6 5) — +0.97 teat length | Both A2A2 Beta C and BB Kappa C Another high butterfat% and protein% combination, with calving ease and +0.4 DPR to boot

Siemers Tao Prada (aAa 5 6 1 4 3 2) — +1.38 teat length | Both A2A2 Beta C and BB Kappa C Plus butterfat%, plus protein%, high +1.4 DPR, calving ease; source of wide, sturdy front ends

Wednesday, April 8, 2026

Designing a Breeding Program that gives you a “future” herd

  

Can anyone predict where the dairy industry is heading?    It is easier to predict changes you need to make to increase your competitive edge.    One of these is to bring your Protein production up to match recent gains in Butterfat.    Another is to create MORE ROBUST, MORE CAPACIOUS, MORE MOBILE trouble-free cows to match your milking, housing and feeding environments.

Genetics is not well utilized if all you consider is “ranking” today.    You have to build a cow that is adaptable to future changes, that will have the vigor to live a full life  (not die just as she should get rolling after a second or third calf).    The combination of higher mature production and lower replacement costs gives you the economic edge that the average cow does not give the average dairy today.

If accomplishing this from breeding seems perplexing to you, give us a chance to add some direction to your matings and provide some useful outcross sires.

Mich Livestock Service   For the best in bulls”  and high energy seeds to feed them

               Ph (989) 834- 2661           email:  greg@michiganlivestock.com

Wednesday, April 1, 2026

The importance of good front-end structure for longer cow life

  

Linear mating concepts are much more focused on the rear end (hind legs and feet + udders) than they are on front ends (which also have legs and feet!).    Thus in many herds, problems accumulate in how cows walk, get in and out of stalls, and breathe.                        

Hoof trimmers point out problems in front legs and feet leading to chronic lameness
A poor front foot stance (uneven weight bearing between inner and outer claws) will often lead to lameness.    Your hoof trimmer takes the excess off the toe carrying less weight.    Next time he comes, he sees same cow, and trims the same problem.    You cannot fix a poor front foot by hoof trimming.   It is a problem caused by bad mating selection; she will have this all her life.

The chest of cows need to be deep enough to house a fully functioning heart and wide enough to fully and easily inflate the lungs.    Thus a triangulated (“wedge shape”) front end is best.   In  such a front end, the elbow places the foreleg “out” to provide a more sturdy stance, the feet will point straight ahead (rather than spindled to the side) and the weight bearing will be even from side to side.    Cows will get up and down easily, and feet will wear evenly, minimizing the need for hoof trimming.    ( Interestingly, you will find the head on the cow proportional to the dimensions of the front end. )

A proportional front end will carry that proportionality into the body
When the front end of the cow has the desired wedge shape, you will find the body also has a desirable “wedge shape” (over the topline, from “sharp” shoulders the back expands to “broad” hips: in side view, the ribs sweep back at an angle from elbows getting longer as they approach the flank at the joining of fore udder to body wall).

Ribs need to be both “elastic” and deep, NOT tight and shallow.     When the skeletal frame has these three “triangle” dimensions, you will have fully functioning ruminant digestion.

But the front end is the “engine” of the cow, housing heart (blood circulation) and lungs (blood oxygenation) essential to maintaining the body for a full productive life.    286 pounds of blood circulate through the udder for every pound of milk the cow produces!     So capacity in a front end should not be overlooked in your mating selection process.

How does the “aAa” process aid you to consistently produce good front ends?

aAa #1 “DAIRY”  lengthens the neck, triangulates from shoulder to elbow, and broadens hips.
aAa #4 “STRONG”  makes a deeper chest for a larger heart (stronger blood circulation)
aAa # 5 “SMOOTH”  widens the elbow, sets the front leg sturdier, shapes the foot evenly

Bulls  with  great  front  ends

The “modern” cow had its origin in the mid 1960s.    The two most transformative Holstein bulls into that era were Osborndale Ivanhoe and Romandale Reflection Marquis.    “Ivanhoe” was “Tall” and “Dairy”:  “Marquis” was “Tall” and “Strong”.
  
Type classification and Show judging were both changing in favor of such bulls at that time and set the breed up for a rapid improvement in the pace of production, and the ability of cows to have a full lifetime of production, as bulls who sired cows whose production increased as they reached maturity and held steady into older ages.     The “Tall” features they offered, which we now associate with the production of bovine somatotropin (“growth hormone”) helped as the dairy nutrition industry focused on utilizing more corn and oilseeds as production supplement.

Both these bulls had good front ends.    “Ivanhoe” could add refinement while “Marquis” added substance and strength;  these blended well with the “Burke” and  “Dunloggin” bloodlines that dominated early AI programs prior to the advent of frozen semen, that often led to smaller and frailer cow physiques.

What do we seem to need now?     W I D E R  front ends
Here are some choices that will restore width to the narrow front-ended cow.

525 HO 117   Rex PP Red        (aAa 5 4 6 3 1 2)    sturdy front legs, deep chest                Triple Hil
A2A2 for Beta Casein, AB for Kappa Casein.    Improves Protein %          
In combining the “Roxy” and “Apple” cow lines, gains milk yield dramatically into maturity.

515 HO 452   Prada                 (aAa 5 6 1 4 2 3)     sturdy, wide chests, deep rib                A I Total 
A2A2 for Beta Casein, BB for Kappa Casein.   Improves Butterfat % and Protein %
Look to him to improve milkout, this bull helps teats both in placement and length.

54 HO 1156  Pace Setter       (aAa  4 6 2 5 1 3)     deep chest, durable bones                    No Bull
This brand new “No Bull Solutions” sire from Regancrest’s “Barbie” family is a “special” one
His dam is now working on her third lactation and looks capable of 40,000 pounds    

799HO 045  Dynasty             (aAa  3 4 5 2 1 6)     wide at both ends, great rumps            Blondin
A2A2 for Beta Casein, BB for Kappa Casein.   Improves butterfat % and Protein %.
#1 Type of Progeny Proven bulls USA (December 2025)  another Kings Ransom success story

733HO 012  Goliath PP        (aAa  1 2 3 5 4 6)     ultimate “wedge shape” physique         A G 3
A2A2 for Beta Casein, BB for Kappa Casein.    No extremes in linear evaluation.
Combines today’s two leading ranked PP sires:  Stantons Remover PP and Vogue A2P2 PP

Monday, December 8, 2025

The importance of good pelvic structure for lifetime cow function

 

As we study skeletal structure in dairy cows, we should grasp how “three dimensional” pelvic capacity needs to be, for a cow to succeed in all these functional expectations:

The pelvis houses the mammary system
The dimensions of a productive and long-lasting UDDER depend on the cooperation of pelvic bones and the capacity they create.    All the supporting “girdle” to the udder (both center and multiple lateral ligaments) are suspended from the pelvic bones.    A level pelvis with a larger interior spread will help to keep the udder floor level for her entire productive life.


The pelvis contains the calving channel and aids in timely reproduction
Broad hips, wide thurls and “open” pins reduces the chances of a calf getting “stuck” during the delivery process.   Calving Ease really starts with a fully three dimensional pelvic bone structure.
The involution of the uterus after calving is enhanced when the pelvis has proper interior slope from hips to pins, and has allowed minimal trauma to all the interior muscles during parturition.

 
The pelvis is the anchoring point for the hind legs
Hind legs begin with their “thurl socket”, enclosing the swivel ball in the base of the pelvic bone formation.    When the thurls are “wide” it sets the legs out to the side from the body, minimize squeezing of the rear udder between legs that can abraid the udder ligments during movement.
The closer to “central” that thurl position is within the length of the pelvis, the better will be the weight bearing on the foot (minimizing uneven growth requring frequent hoof trimming).


The pelvis can aid in ease of rebreeding cows for their next calving
When thurls are too far back, the pins rise and hind legs kick out behind the cow.    This shifts rear end weight onto the loin, which is not designed to carry that added stress;  flattening the spine, leading to abraded or pinched nerves passing across the back to run rear end functions.
Cows with level pelvis, central thurl, straight spines, get through calving easier, recover faster for rebreeding, and when you have your arm inside to breed her you find the cervix where it needs to be for easier insemination.    

How does the “aAa” process aid you to consistently produce desired pelvic shape?

aAa #1 “DAIRY”  can make hips broader, setting up the forward pelvic dimensions.
aAa #2  “TALL”    helps to raise hips above pins, so you have the proper interior slope.
aAa #3  “OPEN”  helps to make the pelvis wider between thurls and pins for easier calving.

Mating selection can simultaneously increase milk check income potential and also extend the functional lifetime potential   IF you choose bulls in this way.

Inside you will find a discussion on shifting component selection in favor of more Protein while maintaining butterfat  (what traits to consider first).

You will also find a discussion on the importance of pelvic structures for all those functions we expect from a cow   (the most direct guides to make desired change)

It is in the nature of any commodity production, that the model that produces a commodity at the “least cost” generates profits, whereas trying to maximize yield generates increased costs;  incremental yield gains can cost more than they give us in profit.    We can apply genetic selection better to lower costs first, improve yields only as they can provide increased income at a below average cost.

 

Mich Livestock Service, Inc.   For the Best in Bulls -- and the forages to feed them
PO Box 661   Ovid  MI  48866   ph (989) 834- 2661    Your alternative to “generic”

 

Monday, December 1, 2025

What is going on in the milk market(s)? How do we breed for income now?

 

The latest milk report from Co-Bank’s Corey Geiger indicates that the price of butterfat dropped 25% of its value since 2025 began.    This ends eight years in which butterfat exceeded the price for protein.    Meanwhile, this year, the price for protein has started to climb; it now exceeds the butterfat price by $0.75.     Does this mean we should change any of our breeding focuses?

The three  highest heritable traits measured are Lactose %, Protein %, and Butterfat %.   While we do not get paid much for “lactose” (milk sugars),  under component pricing formulas it is the Protein and Butterfat yields that account for over 85% of your total milk check.  Your most direct route today to increasing your milk check pay price is to select in favor of both PTA pr% and PTA bf%  (not pounds, as you have been told by everyone for decades.  I will explain why.)

Let us say you already produce 80 pounds per cow daily.    Following industry recommendations you feed a total ration that is “balanced”-- between forages (component stimulants) and grains (fluid stimulants).    Encouraged to reach higher pounds yields, you add more energy dense feed stuffs (maybe oilseeds, maybe bypass proteins).   Added energy density inputs increase the cost of the ration.   Do we get more components, or do we just get more milk, at the same bf% and pr% levels as before?   An extra 5 pounds of milk per day might mean 0.20 pounds butterfat and 0.15 pounds of protein to sell—worth (0.2 x $1.80) + (0.15 x $2.30) 70 cents per cow per day.  If your hauling costs (priced on pounds) are $2.00/cwt, deduct 10 cents for added weight; the net income gain (before added feed costs) is then 60 cents per cow daily.

If instead we accept the yield pounds we currently produce, but concentrate on raising percent of salable components, using bulls +0.15% butterfat and +0.10% protein, we gain 12 pounds of butterfat (worth $1.80 x 12 = $2.16) and 8 pounds of protein (worth $2.30 x 8 = $1.84) which is a total of $ 4.00 per cow per day.  There is no added hauling (same pounds total weight) and if your ration stayed the same, your feed costs stay the same.     Why do we get more?   Because in selecting directly for percent of components, we alter all 80 pounds of the cows’ daily yield, not just the incremental 5 pounds (what you can expect from more energy density)…

This explains why many western dairymen have switched from Holsteins to Jerseys over the last two decades.    With fluid utilizations at 40% or less, and skim milk jugs selling at a loss in major supermarket chains, these dairymen figured out producing more pounds was working against them.    They chose instead to switch to production models that produce more value.

Here are examples of  “more value”  bulls -- for surviving milk price fluctuations

525 HO 146   Garden-State Feature- P *RC   (aAa: 423615  “Strong, Tall, Open”)
He is that rare combination of A2A2 for Beta Casein and BB for Kappa Casein
His Butterfat % rating is +0.15%  (95 pctile)   and his Protein % rating is +0.12%  (99 pctile)
His calving  ease is 2.4% which is an acceptable level – generally safe for heifers.
His dam, with 145,077 pounds of 4.4% butterfat and 3.7% protein lifetime production, is a
sixth generation “Excellent” rated cow who goes back maternally to the “Finesse” family.

515 HO 402   Siemers Tao Prada              (aAa:  561432  “Smooth, Style, Dairy”)
Again, we have that rare combination of A2A2 for Beta Casein and BB for Kappa Casein
His butterfat% rating is +0.15%   (95 pctile)   and his Protein % rating is +0.08%  (90 pctile)
His calving ease is 2.3% which is acceptably safe for heifers.
His DPR rating is +1.9% -- which among bulls plus for PTA Milk is exceptional.
He also shows a +1.41 linear score for teat length--  also exceptional when so many modern bulls seem to shorten teats to the point where milking claws fail to stay attached.
His dam is a third generation of cows producing over 1000# protein and 1500# butterfat—that means over $5000 in milk check income for a single lactation!


515 HO 516   Ar-Joy El Fenomeno -PP        (aAa:  426531  “Strong, Tall, Style”)
Not only homozygous polled but another source of A2A2 Beta Casein and BB Kappa Casein
His butterfat % rating is  +0.06%  and his protein % rating is +0.04% 
His calving ease is also 2.3%  which is in the safe range for heifers.
Maternal grandsire “Parfect” is starting to show up in pedigrees of better conformation sires;
“Fenomeno PP” has a PTA Type of +2.05 which is exceptional among “pure polled” AI sires

Each of these three have physically sound physiques with durability in their leg structures.

Thursday, July 31, 2025

Taking Care When Handling Semen to Optimize Conception

  Mark Curry    (989) 984- 7027         Route Services and Sales
Sue Palen       (989) 277- 0480         Office Coordinator/ Products program
Greg Palen     (989) 277- 6031         “aAa” Breeding Guide / Certified Seed Specialist

Mich Livestock Service, Inc    “For the Best in Bulls”    “High Energy Forage Seed”
110 N Main St   (PO Box 661)   Ovid,  MI  48866                    phone (989) 834- 2661
email:
greg@michiganlivestock.com             website:  www.michiganlivestock.com

 

Sending and receiving ”vapor phase” cryogenic shippers
Your farm tank is charged with liquid nitrogen, at a temperature of -320 degrees F.    Our truck inventory tanks are also liquid tanks, so when you buy semen it is at -320F temperature, and the general processor recommendation is that the canes should transfer from supply tank to your tank in less than ten seconds.    When dealing with 1/4cc straws (sexed or imported semen) the recommendation is less than eight seconds.     Here is where problems start:  the neck tube of your tank only has nitrogen vapor which rises to -140 degrees F.    As canes or straws come out of the neck, they rise above -140 degrees F, which is the minimum safe temperature for semen transport—thus the “less than ten” and “less than eight” second rules.

Most semen today is shipped via UPS or Federal Express in “Doble” or “vapor phase” shippers (DOT rules do not allow parcel carriers to handle “wet” nitrogen tanks).    Thus shipped semen is only at -140 degrees F during transport.    When we receive shippers here, we pour them full of liquid nitrogen before extracting semen, in order for protective liquid (-320F cold) to be in the straw cups when they move to our storage and transport.    Without this step, it is easy for the semen arriving via UPS to be damaged just removing it from the vapor shipper.    For most of us, if we order semen to be shipped direct to our farms (bypassing someone like us) you run the risk of damage in handling it from the shipper into your semen tank.    Again, the risk is greater if the semen (like gender selected) is packaged in the smaller diameter 1/4cc straws.

Pulling straws from your tank in order to breed cows
If you look in the neck of your semen tank, you will see there is a line of frost a couple inches down in.    This is the line above which canisters should not be pulled, it indicates how high the “safe” -140F temperature for stored semen is for your tank.    Using tweezers to extract straws inside the neck of the tank, preserves your remaining inventory at safe temps.    Pull a canister above the neck of the tank will progressively damage your semen, reducing conception rates.

Here is what happened to one of our suppliers
They sent semen on eight bulls to an independent AI service in Arkansas by UPS, in vapor tanks.   As cows began to be bred, conception rates were falling.    Retrieving the unused semen, we had it evaluated by Hawkeye Breeders’ lab in Iowa.     As part of the test, we separated straws out of TOP cups from straws in BOTTOM cups, same bulls.    Uniformly, the semen looked better from BOTTOM cups (which stayed in the body of the tank) but looked poorer from TOP cups.   It was easy to infer that these inseminators were poorly trained in semen handling and storage;  but it could also indicate that they had no nitrogen available to reliquefy the shipper before removing the canes when received.   

Avoid  overstocking  canes  in  your  own  tank
When it is time to breed a cow, you will go to your tank to pull out a straw of semen.    Again, as we think about the “ten second” (1/2cc) and “eight second” (1/4cc) rules, ask yourself how easy you (first)  find the  individual cane  with the chosen bull;  then (second)  extract a  single straw from that cane, returning the cane back down into the canister and the canister back down into the body of the tank.    If you hear a lot of sizzling when returning cane and canister, consider it may be taking you too long  to do this.     How much of that extra time is used up trying to find the right cane, pulling the cane away from other canes in the canister, and drawing out a straw from it?     Over time, you are creating the same damage to straws in the upper cups of canes that we could document from the semen testing experiment we did with Hawkeye Breeders.

It has become a strong suggestion from semen suppliers to avoid ordering in quantities other than 5 straw multiples, so that no one in the delivery chain has to separate straws out of a cup and transfer them into another cup.    This is part of the industry effort to maintain conception.

Avoid  thawing  multiple  straws  at  once  when  group  breeding
With straw technology it only takes 40 seconds to fully thaw a 1/2cc straw in 95 degree F water, less than 30 seconds to fully thaw a 1/4cc straw in 95 degree F water.    By contrast, if straws are left in thaw bath for longer than 15 minutes, the activated sperm cells begin to suffocate.   Now that so many Ov Synch “timed breeding” groups are done, especially in larger expansion herds, we see lower conception rates mostly related to expecting an inseminator to breed many cows at a time with no assistance in moving cows to chutes or loading AI guns before walking alleys.    Too many of them will thaw an entire cup or cane of straws at once.   Can they really get ten (or even five) cows accurately inseminated in less than 15 minutes??      

Try  to  locate  semen  tanks  and  AI  equipment  close  to  the  breeding  area
Having to carry a loaded breeding gun the length of a barn or free-stall pen in all but summer temperatures, can expose the thawed semen to “cold shock” which has been known for years to damage seasonal conception rates.    Live sperm cells expect to be at near body temperature.

Saturday, June 7, 2025

Genetic Selection has longer-term consequences

USDA’s Beltsville MD research farm did Dairy crossbreeding experiments in the 1940s- 1950s. Once that was concluded, the Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory decided to enter into  Genetic Evaluation for purebreds (originated by the individual purebred Breed Associations).

The Predicted Difference was born in the 1960s.   While purebred associations were publishing sire daughter averages and daughter vs dam (“intergenerational”) comparison proofs, the AIPL produced daughter vs herdmate (“intragenerational”) comparisons, then introduced the idea that we could “rank” sires on the size of those deviations, named “Predicted Differences”.

This evolved into the Modified Contemporary Comparison.    Purebred breeder criticism of the PD concept revolved around the lower national DHIA breed averages compared to the “official” (supervised testing) HIR lactation averages from which Breed Association “proofs” were based.   Could bulls proven in below-average environments be equally useful for the highly preselected breeding herd?    MCC factored in the rankings of herdmates’ sires and pedigree indexes on the sires evaluated to produce what they now called Predicted Transmitting Ability.   The first index “composite trait ranking” was introduced, named  Net Merit $,  a term that has carried forward to the present time (although its formula has been repeatedly changed).

Through this entire period, into the beginnings of Genomic (DNA-based) ranking indexes, one thing remained the same:  Mature Equivalent factoring of young cows’ lactation records.   ME  was used by the purebred associations to allow “intergenerational” comparison of first lactation cows to their matured and maturing dams with multiple age lactations.    We used MEs because     in every tested dairy breed in the USA cows were observed to milk 30% to 40% more milk in their mature-age lactations than they did in first lactation.   MEs created “parity” over a range of age.

ME factors got carried over by AIPL into USDA “intragenerational” comparison of cows to same age contemporaries.    Anyone who understood high school mathematics could have seen that the only effect of using MEs instead of actual records was to inflate the deviations.    Yet the AI industry continued using ME data, perhaps thinking it would prove “the new bulls are better”.   

The primary goal of dairy genetics has been to “accelerate” the age of maximum cow yields.   The initial premise of the “PD” was that those heifers with the highest deviations were faster at maturing their production than the average of their contemporaries.   In fact as you broke down lactations (as the “Test Day Model” did later do) the key aspect of high PTA Milk sires was their daughters set the highest peak test yields in their first lactations.   The linear type trait appraisal system (used by all breeds today) was later based on the appearance of high-peaking cows.

Geneticists have succeeded in transforming cows to be faster maturing (and faster aging).   
Being mathematicians (rather than biologists) they never anticipated that making cows mature quicker would just accelerate the physical aging process, until three calvings wears them out.

Where are we today with all of this genetic evaluation ranking emphasis ?

The Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding (CDCB), successor to AIPL in index formulation and DNA application to Genomic ranking, has declared that ME factors are no longer used for calculating PTA values.    It seems that Genetic Selection for faster maturity has succeeded;  we no longer have any mature cows!     Why add 30% to every heifer lactation if only 20% of them will still be alive at the species age of maturity (five years)?    Just compare actual production.

Basically, today’s average cow will  die  before the end of her third lactation.    Cows no longer improve by 30% to 40% over their first lactation, because 80+% of all cows only complete two lactations.    It now takes as many days to raise a heifer calf to milking as we expect to milk her after her first calving!     Financial experts will tell you  the average dairy cow wears out before you have recovered her cost of raising.    There is currently a shortage of replacement cows so we are seeing prices APPROACHING $4000 to buy a replacement fresh heifer—and this in spite of technologies that were supposed to solve this, starting with PTA “Productive Life” indexes, and leading to the gender sexing of semen to favor 90% heifer calves.

In short, dairy industry application of 1960s genetic theories, as applied through AIPL’s index calculations and various ranking indexes, has changed the dairy cow’s lifetime epigenetically.    All the genes in modern Genomic cows’ DNA were existent in the cows from the 1960s , but in today’s environment they no longer help cows to live a full productive life.  Breed averages for realized PL today (after ten generations of measuring it) are essentially unchanged since 1990.
Getting entire populations to focus on one “selection path” (the ideal Genomic genotype) will, over time, virtually eliminate all heterosis for functional length of life.

Linear trait evaluation has taught us to admire cows with “frail” physiques.    Following show type selection paths frequently builds cows who are out of functional proportions, but may still possess more desired “femininity” as it relates to natural fertility and will to milk.   Genomics on the other hand, has confused “beefiness” with health support traits and in spite of all the “talk” about how the latest trait emphasis is on feed efficiency and reducing methane emission, none of this will come to fruition; the basic, underlying physical construction of high Genomic cows is grain and oilseed dependent and lacks the capacity to use low-cost perennial forages effectively.   

Finding a genetic solution to this historical inbred genetic selection path

Start paying attention to sires from cow lines recognized for “longevity” that show multiple lactations of consistent maturing performance over many generations.  In today’s sire populations, these are the only true “outcross” sires.    They will offer the ability for more “even” body conditioning and flatter, more persistent lactation curves reducing total feed costs.  They will give you cows with better natural fertility characteristics.  These will include the highest combined butterfat% and protein% bulls, especially if you are seeking A2A2 Beta Casein alongside BB Kappa Casein to qualify for future premium milk marketing options.        

 

Monday, February 10, 2025

Breeding for easier calving

Selecting “calving ease” sires only affects birthing of the calf.    It does not provide you cows that will calve easier in the future.    (There is a separate selection trait, called “daughter calving ease” that is a better indicator.)

Given the relatively low levels of heritability for most linear evaluation traits, they are not adequate to the full job of consistently breeding better physiques into the herd.    For this, the qualities identified in your herd (and in AI sires) by the “aAa” breeding guide are more reliable (and more directly related to function).    

How many genetic characteristics affect calving ease?    Open this newsletter and find out.    As with all aspects of biology, there are multiple gene factors and there is the over-riding epigenetic effect from the nutritional environment you created for your herd.    It is a manageable situation regardless of your breeds.

If you still have questions after reading this, ask us.    We are here to be helpful.

Mich Livestock Service, Inc    ***     “For the Best in Bulls”   and   “High Energy forages”
Ovid,  Michigan        phone (989) 834- 2661          email  “greg@michiganlivestock.com”

Monday, February 3, 2025

Understanding “calving ease” (differences in breeds and in crossbreeding)

 

CONCEPTIONS  Dairy route newsletter                    Nov Dec 2024

Mark Curry   
  (989) 984- 7027     Route services and sales / Ov Synch AI by appointment

Sue Palen         (989) 277- 0480     Office manager, product sales

Greg Palen       (989) 277- 6031     “aAa” Breeding Guide / certified forage seed specialist

Mich Livestock Service, Inc         “For the Best in Bulls   and   High Energy forages”
110 N Main St   (PO Box 661)    Ovid,  MI  48866       ***       phone (989) 834- 2661
email:  
greg@michiganlivestock.com          website:   www.michiganlivestock.com 

 

Why is it mostly in the Holstein breed that we collect data on calving difficulty?    The only way to explain it is to compare with other breeds, and then to suggest the impacts of indexing as it culled some bloodlines while multiplying others.

Comparing familiar breeds.    Holsteins and Brown Swiss have the largest frames, also had the longest length of gestation (time a cow carries the calf before birth).    Historically, Brown Swiss cows carry calves 288 days;  a Holstein cow 283 days;  a Jersey cow 276 Days.   For Jersey calves, they tend to be born at 5%  of mother’s mature size.   Thus they will weigh around 50# when born (1000# mature size  x  5%:  With 800# first calf heifers a 50# calf is not an issue).   Beyond the shorter gestation (fewer days gaining weight inside the cow) Jersey calves also have little to no fat reserve at birth  (their mothers provide it from higher butterfat% milk after birth) (Jersey island has a very mild climate, so native Jerseys did not require extra energy in winter at birth).

Smaller frame size breeds (Jersey, Guernsey, Dutch Belted) tend to reach puberty earlier, and also physically mature a year quicker than large frame breeds:  thus the first calf heifer is more ready to have a calf at a younger age (many Jerseys calve successfully prior to two years of age).

Holsteins, in contrast, tend to be born at 7% of mother’s mature size.    Thus they would weigh around 100# when born (1500# mature size  x 7%;  with 1200# first calf  heifers a 100# calf can be an issue).     As in all breeds, most of the calf weight growth comes in the third trimester, so rations need to avoid being high energy to control calf size.  Holstein calves will be born with a significant body fat reserve (their origin in northern Europe by the North Sea meant adaptation to cold weather climates, calves could stay warmer from metabolizing the body fat).     Holsteins traditionally were slower to mature physically (mature cows usually 30% larger than first calving heifers) so it was safer to breed them to calve their first time after two years old.

Why do Brown Swiss avoid calving issues in spite of longer gestation?   They may be the oldest “pure” breed that came to America.    Originating in Alpine mountain valleys, developed totally on grass for centuries, calving unassisted, culled out hard calving lines before they came here.

How does CDCI calculate “calving ease” today?

Geneticists are in essence mathematicians (data crunchers), not biologists (good at observing behavior and seeking causes for effects).    They were never happy with the “original” calving ease data, because it depended on herdsman observation  (did she calve by herself easily?  Or did she calve safely with mild assistance?  Or was she going to die calving without assistance?)

The first enhancement to farmer observation was to calculate Stillbirth rates.   If a calf is born dead, they assume she had a “hard calving”.    There were many “calving ease” bulls (I recall “Morty” and “BW Marshall”) who lost their calving ease designation with this change.   More importantly, they learned that calf livability was genetically influenced.

The next (and equally important) enhancement was the realization that  Gestation length  was genetically influenced too.   Shorter gestation became used to enhance calving ease (geneticists preferring a “statistic” over “observation”) and is now a big part of the calculation.

At this point, the hubris of CDCI (Council for Dairy Cattle Improvement, which took over from AIPL- USDA Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory with the introduction of Genomics) says “we have solved calving ease”.     According to the data trends,  average difficult births fell from 8.6% (pre genomic) to 2.3% …  Genomic procedures have “identified the genes for calving ease”.

A word about CDCI  (an uneasy partnership between purebred breed associations and invested AI bull studs focusing on Genomic selection)  -- their calculations for DPR  (daughter pregnancy rate)  do not sort between “natural” conceptions and “OvSynch” conceptions.    Likewise their calculations of “calving difficulty” do not sort between gender-selected calves and conventional semen calves; but in herds that participate in DHIA data collection, “OvSynch” reproduction and using “sexed” semen on virgin heifers is the “norm”….   

Feeding for easier calving

What you feed your heifers in the third trimester (last three months of gestation) when 75% of the calf growth occurs  in utero  has a big influence on  birth weights and thus calving difficulty.   That calf is growing 2+ pounds per day in the last two weeks prior to birth.    High starch energy TMRs (higher in corn, oilseeds, commodity energy sources to force size into younger heifers) are going to produce larger calves than you will get from heifers grown out on high forage diets.

For crossbreeders, if you are using any breed that originated in a region (like France?) where it is not customary to feed corn and soybeans, you might get calves 40% heavier from a corn based TMR than a forage based feed regimen;  you may also see excessive fat deposits in their udders as well as within the pelvis, making calving and then rebreeding more difficult.    It required two decade of genetic selection to produce Holsteins and Jerseys in the USA that could eat corn and oilseed-based rations and make milk, instead of getting fat OR sick…  the linear trait system that CDCI champions was first designed to identify the physical cow that would make milk from corn.

Genetic selection affecting calving ease

Holstein USA released a study several years ago indicating that the breed average Stature was increasing at a rate of 2 inches per generation.    Why would this happen?    Before Genomics was introduced, the “TPI” selection index favored Stature in type classification, and was more focused on PTA Milk yield than the “Net Merit” index (focused on PTA Butterfat and Protein).

Because PTA milk yields were in “Mature Equivalent” rather than actual yield volumes, this was giving an advantage to the faster maturing sire lines.     These tend to have Tall features  (within “aAa” observation), a quality gene-linked to the production of “growth hormone”.    Once we had DNA testing, and Genomic indexing put higher weights on “health and fitness” traits, these sires tend to have Strong features (within “aAa” observation).    The combined direction for the two qualities mentioned is to produce larger cows at younger ages (outgrowing older facilities).   

The biggest genetic impact on calf size is (as suggested earlier) mother’s expected mature size.   Without selection in favor of shorter gestation (and low energy density feed in third trimesters) we would generally be seeing larger calves from Holstein heifers;  thus there is risk in breeding Holstein heifers to calve before two years of age.    The general “safety” rule is to wait to breed heifers until they are 55% of their expected mature weight.      Measure your cows to figure it.

Breeding for easier calving

Every breed has difficult calving individuals  (no single breed “insures” calvings will always be easy—although Jerseys come pretty close).    When we approach these cows using the “aAa” breeding guide, we can identify what causes problems and identify the kind of bull that prevents heifers having the same problems.

The “aAa” breeding guide regulates the frame proportions in your cows.   This can really be seen in the pelvic structures of cows produced from “aAa” matings.    At Mark Yeazel’s “Ja Bob” herd dispersal one year ago, a retired sire analyst (serving as a ringman) told me “I can always tell when a dairyman has used “aAa”, their cows will have a correct Rump structure”.     Herds bred for Genomic “Net Merit” are showing tight hips, which narrows rump width regardless of how “Open” the rear skeleton appears.   (Over multiple generations, basing selection purely on Genomic ranking might turn “dairy” cows into beef-framed cows!).    

Basically, after three generations of Genomic selection based on a single selection index without regard to physical mating, your herd will begin to show “inbreeding depression”.    Research into inbreeding lists lost natural fertility, more calving difficulty, and higher stillbirth rates as some of the consequences.    Single trait selection is known to be the true cause of “inbreeding losses”.   Because “aAa” guides you to a “heterosis” physical mating, it is the industry’s most reliable and practical method to avoid “inbreeding depression” effects, including difficult heifer calving.