Monday, August 11, 2025

OUR FAVORITE ‘MATERNAL” ANGUS BULL

 

Mark Curry        (989) 984- 7027         Route Service and Sales
Sue Palen           (989) 277- 0480         “Cattle Visions” order desk / products program
Greg Palen         (989) 277- 6031         Certified Seed Specialist /  refresher AI training

Mich Livestock Service, Inc     “For the Best in Bulls”      “High Energy Forage Seed”
110 N Main St   (PO Box 661)   Ovid,  MI  48866                      phone (989) 834- 2661

email:  greg@michiganlivestock.com        website:  www.michiganlivestock.com         (Facebook)

 

K R  SYNERGY  7023    (page six at bottom, Cattle Visions 2025 catalog)

This guy has been around for several years and remains popular in the Angus breeding world, and while described for superior performance (for example, 115 weaning ratio)  the proportions of his phenotype as translated into females shows the “maternal” physique and an ability to make milk.

     
If you have online access, check out the photos of his females on his page in the Cattle Visions website, Angus section.    His trait profile has some indicators of maternal ability also, and he has been a consistent semen producer (good libido in a bull often translates to fecundity in his females).

 

Thursday, August 7, 2025

Make breeding into a new profit center

 

There is a $1000 profit per salable fresh heifer in current market prices over the costs of rearing a dairy heifer.     When everyone is chasing the highest deacon calf prices,  the opportunity in raising salable replacements just gets bigger and better.

The cycles in agriculture (prices and cost) always seem to favor that farmer who is able to pursue a counter-cyclical management strategy.    In Dairy, that has always been the dairyman who produces more heifers than he needs.    Today it pays the best it has ever paid in my lifetime.   Is your breeding strategy up to the challenge to help supply the endless demand for replacement dairy cows?    All it takes first is a shift in favor of “longevity” selection and “adaptable physique” mating.

Let us help you make that transition.    You might even save money in the process short-term, but more importantly, will increase farm income longer-term.

 

Mich Livestock Service, Inc        ph (989) 834- 2661         For the Best in Bulls”
Triple-Hil Sires, Masterpiece Sires, No Bull Solutions, Blondin Sires, AG3 Genetics, AI Total
New Generation Genetics (Brown Swiss), Sustainable Genetics and Reverence Farms (Jersey)

Monday, August 4, 2025

There is no PRODUCTION without prior REPRODUCTION

 

Poultry farmers know this—“no eggs, no income”.    Swine producers know this as well—“no sows nursing piglets, no pork chops to sell”.     Sheep flocks are pushed to lamb twice in fifteen months.   Beef cow-calf operators know this very painfully at today’s calf values—“no calf, no income”.    Why when it comes to Dairy, has the production industry been so casual about reproduction?

Remember when Monsanto was promoting the eighteen month calving interval, and some of the rBST users were bragging up 1000-day lactations (cows who only calved once in their life)?

Today’s replacement heifer shortage  (in spite of widespread use of “gender selected” semen)  and the record-setting prices that are now double what springing heifers brought as recently as three years ago,  brings me to review all the high technology adaptive concepts that have been promoted to trusting dairymen, in the constant chase for “more milk”.

It really all began with the development of Predicted Transmitting Ability, the ranking of sires primarily on first-lactation milk volume.   Heifers who “peaked” the highest gave their sires the magic +1000 PD Milk rating, even if it took them 500 days to calve back—only the first 305 days’ milk multiplied by “ME” (Mature Equivalent) factors counted “genetically”.     In each generation bred this way, average conception rates fell, average calving intervals fell, percentage of stillborn calves increased, and incidence of post-calving metabolic disease rose.     The Genetics industry blamed your bad luck on nutritionists and veterinarians, instead of taking responsibility for the accumulating inbreeding effects from “single trait” genetic selection they promote.

Breeders who continued to base their breeding programs on strong maternal lines with strong natural fertility and competitive longevity could not compete with a genetic ranking system that was biased in favor of sire stacks of +1000  PD Milk bulls.    Today, under Genomic theories, cow values cannot produce enough “data” to alter the sire-centric pedigree-bound calculations.

How  do  we  reclaim  profitable  levels  of  fertility  in  our  dairy  herds?

The industry error is to act as if “selection” and “mating” are one and the same.   Cull rates, and  75 years of herd observations in the “aAa” breeding guide, prove these two functions different.     By ignoring this, basing all selection on intragenerational sire comparison, the half of your herd genetic profile descended from your cow lines  is being mismanaged.    Your best cows are not being given the chance to produce the best possible offspring.    Your worst cow is treated as if she will breed exactly the same as your best cows.    New cull cows are being reproduced.

Milk yield is half sire genetics, half cow physical capability  and “aAa” focuses on the physique.

Thursday, July 31, 2025

Taking Care When Handling Semen to Optimize Conception

  Mark Curry    (989) 984- 7027         Route Services and Sales
Sue Palen       (989) 277- 0480         Office Coordinator/ Products program
Greg Palen     (989) 277- 6031         “aAa” Breeding Guide / Certified Seed Specialist

Mich Livestock Service, Inc    “For the Best in Bulls”    “High Energy Forage Seed”
110 N Main St   (PO Box 661)   Ovid,  MI  48866                    phone (989) 834- 2661
email:
greg@michiganlivestock.com             website:  www.michiganlivestock.com

 

Sending and receiving ”vapor phase” cryogenic shippers
Your farm tank is charged with liquid nitrogen, at a temperature of -320 degrees F.    Our truck inventory tanks are also liquid tanks, so when you buy semen it is at -320F temperature, and the general processor recommendation is that the canes should transfer from supply tank to your tank in less than ten seconds.    When dealing with 1/4cc straws (sexed or imported semen) the recommendation is less than eight seconds.     Here is where problems start:  the neck tube of your tank only has nitrogen vapor which rises to -140 degrees F.    As canes or straws come out of the neck, they rise above -140 degrees F, which is the minimum safe temperature for semen transport—thus the “less than ten” and “less than eight” second rules.

Most semen today is shipped via UPS or Federal Express in “Doble” or “vapor phase” shippers (DOT rules do not allow parcel carriers to handle “wet” nitrogen tanks).    Thus shipped semen is only at -140 degrees F during transport.    When we receive shippers here, we pour them full of liquid nitrogen before extracting semen, in order for protective liquid (-320F cold) to be in the straw cups when they move to our storage and transport.    Without this step, it is easy for the semen arriving via UPS to be damaged just removing it from the vapor shipper.    For most of us, if we order semen to be shipped direct to our farms (bypassing someone like us) you run the risk of damage in handling it from the shipper into your semen tank.    Again, the risk is greater if the semen (like gender selected) is packaged in the smaller diameter 1/4cc straws.

Pulling straws from your tank in order to breed cows
If you look in the neck of your semen tank, you will see there is a line of frost a couple inches down in.    This is the line above which canisters should not be pulled, it indicates how high the “safe” -140F temperature for stored semen is for your tank.    Using tweezers to extract straws inside the neck of the tank, preserves your remaining inventory at safe temps.    Pull a canister above the neck of the tank will progressively damage your semen, reducing conception rates.

Here is what happened to one of our suppliers
They sent semen on eight bulls to an independent AI service in Arkansas by UPS, in vapor tanks.   As cows began to be bred, conception rates were falling.    Retrieving the unused semen, we had it evaluated by Hawkeye Breeders’ lab in Iowa.     As part of the test, we separated straws out of TOP cups from straws in BOTTOM cups, same bulls.    Uniformly, the semen looked better from BOTTOM cups (which stayed in the body of the tank) but looked poorer from TOP cups.   It was easy to infer that these inseminators were poorly trained in semen handling and storage;  but it could also indicate that they had no nitrogen available to reliquefy the shipper before removing the canes when received.   

Avoid  overstocking  canes  in  your  own  tank
When it is time to breed a cow, you will go to your tank to pull out a straw of semen.    Again, as we think about the “ten second” (1/2cc) and “eight second” (1/4cc) rules, ask yourself how easy you (first)  find the  individual cane  with the chosen bull;  then (second)  extract a  single straw from that cane, returning the cane back down into the canister and the canister back down into the body of the tank.    If you hear a lot of sizzling when returning cane and canister, consider it may be taking you too long  to do this.     How much of that extra time is used up trying to find the right cane, pulling the cane away from other canes in the canister, and drawing out a straw from it?     Over time, you are creating the same damage to straws in the upper cups of canes that we could document from the semen testing experiment we did with Hawkeye Breeders.

It has become a strong suggestion from semen suppliers to avoid ordering in quantities other than 5 straw multiples, so that no one in the delivery chain has to separate straws out of a cup and transfer them into another cup.    This is part of the industry effort to maintain conception.

Avoid  thawing  multiple  straws  at  once  when  group  breeding
With straw technology it only takes 40 seconds to fully thaw a 1/2cc straw in 95 degree F water, less than 30 seconds to fully thaw a 1/4cc straw in 95 degree F water.    By contrast, if straws are left in thaw bath for longer than 15 minutes, the activated sperm cells begin to suffocate.   Now that so many Ov Synch “timed breeding” groups are done, especially in larger expansion herds, we see lower conception rates mostly related to expecting an inseminator to breed many cows at a time with no assistance in moving cows to chutes or loading AI guns before walking alleys.    Too many of them will thaw an entire cup or cane of straws at once.   Can they really get ten (or even five) cows accurately inseminated in less than 15 minutes??      

Try  to  locate  semen  tanks  and  AI  equipment  close  to  the  breeding  area
Having to carry a loaded breeding gun the length of a barn or free-stall pen in all but summer temperatures, can expose the thawed semen to “cold shock” which has been known for years to damage seasonal conception rates.    Live sperm cells expect to be at near body temperature.

Saturday, July 26, 2025

SUCCESS COMES FROM MASTERING THE BIG PICTURE

My brief time on Michigan Hay and Forage Council taught me this:
Everyone does not agree that  “One Size Fits All”…
     Even among “experts”.

 

Behind most long-term successful businesses you will find owners who developed a philosophy that created a perspective of the “big picture” and a moral compass to guide the decision-making process.

In Beef cow-calf production, even if your goal is a successful show season (which is maybe a month long across spring summer and fall) the success of your breeding program is that it meets all needs—reproduction, live calvings, cow longevity and calf marketability, manageable input costs, most of which comes from underlying farming decisions.    Genetic selection of animals responds to the genetics of soil life and plant diversity, insuring a more profitable herd.

 

Mich Livestock Service, Inc    “For the Best in Bulls”   “High Energy Forage seed”

Wednesday, July 23, 2025

BUILDING BETTER SOIL is what, and when, you choose to plant

The soil is a “living” organism, in the sense it is capable of growing something 365 days a year, either above or below ground  (as with cover crops).

Only growing a monocultural (grain) crop, which from planting to harvesting takes up to 125 days in Michigan latitudes, leaves the soil barren of crops for 240 or more days—  eroding, incubating weeds, while starving the soil biology.

Rotating crops with winter covers and spring-harvested forages, is the first step in regenerating the water holding capacity and tilth of your soils.  Yields will increase.

 

BUILDING  BETTER  SOIL   is returning your livestock to the land

Assuming that we have returned all the animal fertility to the soil by spreading a manure stockpile (or a liquid from a lagoon) is only 30% to 40% true.

Nothing stimulates soil life as much as the real-time passage of livestock across the land.    In the days of wagon trains moving west, the immense growth of grass in the prairies (which annually saw the passage of buffalo and year-around all the species lesser in size) was so dense, and so TALL, that you could not see wagons moving.    (They followed paths of Indian hunters to avoid being totally lost).   It is not just manure fibers, but urine and its retained enzymes, it is hair, it is sluffed off cells, anything falling off the buffalos’ (or cattles’) backs fed some element of the soil life.   

The separation of livestock from soil contact  (accelerated since 1968’s sweeping farm bill beginning subsidies for exportable row crops)  has been part of degrading soil structure, tllth and productivity.

 

If you don’t mind building fence, send your momma cows to pasture, where they will get sunlight vitamins, eat fresh grass, attain healthier levels of body condition, improve circulatory health from exercise, and regain muscle tone to calve easier.

Saturday, July 19, 2025

Allen Williams, PhD (Genetics and Reproductive Physiology) thoughts

Allen grew up on a multi-specie farm in South Carolina;  attended Clemson University intending to return to the family farm.   Instead he was recruited into grad school on a research fellowship and ended up a tenured professor, teaching at Clemson for fifteen years.    He came to perceive that the trend in Agricultural colleges was to research and treat “symptoms” -- rather than the causes – of farm management issues, including lack of profitability.    Leaving Clemson to return to the farm, his college colleagues told him he was making a “disastrous financial mistake”!   He saw that attitude as an indictment of the Ag college viewpoint, that anyone trained as they do could not “make it” actually farming!!!   Today he is a recognized leading voice in “Regenerative Agriculture” concepts and consults worldwide.

Allan has a regular column in Stockman Grass Farmer magazine.   I am taking his online course  “The Basics of Sound Genetics”  and wanted to share some of his introductory ideas with you.

Adaptive  Stewardship

In Allan’s grasp of Genetics  (the “Genetics” industry is basically trait statistics, not biology)  we are forgetting that genotypes do not have a rigid response in all environments,  but “adapt” to the environments we provide (from our view, either positively or negatively).    The emerging science of “Epigenetics” is his current focus, and his term “Adaptive Stewardship” pushes us to be more proactive in creating an environment in which the genetics of soil biology, plant variety and animal breeding have a productive coexistence.

Compared to the North American continent when settlers first arrived here, ALL our farmed and pastured land is a “degraded” resource  --  supporting less bioactivity in the soil, fewer varieties of plants, and thus animals that tend to need energy supplementation to reach market stages.

Degraded ecosystem

In specifics, the ratio of mycchorizal fungi to bacteria is way off the optimum.    Fungi produces the “glue” that holds soil structure together, and aids in the transport of nutrients into the root zone of our plants.    The loss of this fungal balance in soils has led us to an increasing volume of chemical fertilizer use, increasing the cost of every crop we grow.

The goal in “Regenerative Ag” is (1) to redevelop bio-active soils with high organic matter, (2) a soil structure that provides proper water cycling, (3) an increased diversity in beneficial plant species, leading to (4) improved and ,more predictable animal performance.     These are steps beyond the concepts of “Sustainable Agriculture”, in which we focus on practices that keep us in business through controlling cost of inputs (in commodity agriculture, profits flow to lowest cost producers rather than those who keep buying inputs seeking higher volume production).

Both Sustainable Ag and Regenerative Ag are clearly different approaches than what is seen as “spend your way to prosperity” mainstream agriculture thinking (as extolled by most land grant universities whose research focuses are financed by industrial Ag vendors).    In the mainstream of agriculture, the typical consultant will say things like  at current crop values we can’t afford to feed the SOIL so let’s focus on feeding the next CROP”.     Given a strong trend in farming over the recent fifty years toward more annual row crops and less perennial forages and permanent pasture, farmers struggle with more soil compaction, less rainfall retention, more weeds, losing organic matter, and with the separation of livestock into concentrated feed lots, losing biological balance in the soil.    Thus our animals have more health and insect trouble, as nutrient density in their feed decreases linearly with the relentless chasing of higher crop yields via chemicals.

Summary quotes

“Nature will humble you, and if you are fighting nature she will defeat you.”    In the linear study of individual traits (plant or animal) we have tended to pursue these too far, into extremes.

Wendell Berry, KY farmer and sage, writing in New York Times in 2018:
“Agricultural choices must be made by these inescapable standards:  the ecological health of the farm, and the economic health of the farmer.”     [Farmer suicide rates have increased each year since 2018, clearly Mr Berry’s standards are not being followed.]

Masenobu Fukuoka, Japanese researcher and eminent farming observer:
“An object seen in isolation from the whole is not the real thing.”    [This is applicable to current tendencies in ag research to break the big picture down to fractions of the total issue.]      

What does all this mean?

To focus on animal genetics alone, instead of starting with soil biology, is to limit your success.